(Double Click) [to Close]

map of fijian islands

images Malolo Island Map - Fiji map of fijian islands. Fiji Islands Map
  • Fiji Islands Map



  • pappu
    01-02 08:13 PM
    I have posted about immigrationvoice.org in following yahoo groups

    IIT- Global (2526 members)
    IIT-midwest(317 members)
    IITK-westcoast(766 members)
    Inter IIT (4654 members)

    I hope this helps.

    Good Luck to All

    -Shukla
    Thank you very much

    could you and couple of more members volunteer to post messages on the following sites
    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=16078&postcount=42
    Pls post on this thread once you have posted.





    wallpaper Fiji Islands Map map of fijian islands. Map of Fiji amp; Location of
  • Map of Fiji amp; Location of



  • pappu
    06-14 01:13 PM
    http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/TransformationConOps_Mar07.pdf





    map of fijian islands. MAP OF FIJI ISLANDS
  • MAP OF FIJI ISLANDS



  • .soulty
    03-11 12:33 AM
    thats better.. cool, so i'll contact grinch to see if he is happy to get this poll ready.





    2011 Map of Fiji amp; Location of map of fijian islands. Map of Fiji
  • Map of Fiji



  • bharad
    02-04 02:38 PM
    have sent you a p.m.



    more...


    map of fijian islands. Second Segment
  • Second Segment



  • qplearn
    11-24 11:02 AM
    Ok. This is new to me. Can someone confirm if this is true? Is there any link that supports this?
    --------
    I guess Employer cannot revoke I-140 after 180 days - You may want to check with Immigration Specialist/lawyer


    Yes this is correct. If you have an approved I-140 and your I-485 is pending for 180 days, the employer cannot revoke your I-140 unless there is fraud in getting the I-140. If you have done joint filing of the two, if you get your I-140 within 6 months of the joint filing, you can change employers immediately after that. Of course, you can't just go to any employer; it has a to be a similar job.





    map of fijian islands. Fiji Map.gif (7126 bytes)
  • Fiji Map.gif (7126 bytes)



  • addsf345
    12-10 07:49 PM
    you hit the nail ... this is the biggest reason ...We are just too many and everyone wants to come to US

    don't you think that working towards removing unfair country quota in skilled category would be faster & easier than population control?

    Now that you are enlighted about being one among too many, are you planning to go back, and reduce backlog for others?

    Also, when talking about reducing indian population, I hope that you do not agree with what 10 pakistanis tried to do in mumbai few days back!!! That is one very bad way of reducing population! I would prefer load balancing i.e. moving some ppl to part of world where population is not so much. This is called immigration.

    Jokes apart, we need to seriously highlight the fact that as there is no country quota in H1B, since it is a skilled category visa, similarly there should be no country quota in skill based immigration too. We are given visas as their industry need us, but they do not care if we suffer for years. It is nothing but simply 'DESCRIMINATION" based on country of birth.

    Ask this question: Is it a crime to be born in certain country? Do we all have choice to do so? If it is not a crime, why we are being punished?

    Do we have guts to fight that??? we can only talk about some stupid solutions like control indian population and in just next 100 years there will be no retrogression for indians. Some one would also suggest indians must not to study and remain uneducated, so you won't come here under skilled quota and voila - no retrogression!!! but the fact is, we have no unity, no guts and no willingness to stand up for our community. IV is the only effort I have seen in years in right direction.



    more...


    map of fijian islands. Fiji Islands - Guide Map
  • Fiji Islands - Guide Map



  • zuhail
    04-11 01:23 AM
    A very useful piece of information has been brought to our attention by shiankuraaf.
    Thank you very much!

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/LPR08.shtm

    Table 6 Persons Obtaining Legal Permanent Resident Status by Type and Major Class of Admission: Fiscal Years 1999 to 2008

    http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/statistics/publications/YrBk04Im.shtm
    Table 4 Immigrants admitted by type and selected class of admission: fiscal years 1986-2004

    Employment-based preferences (Total Number)

    Year QUOTA ISSUED Unused/Excessively used
    1986 140000 56617 83383
    1987 140000 57519 82481
    1988 140000 58727 81273
    1989 140000 57741 82259
    1990 140000 58192 81808
    1991 140000 59525 80475
    1992 140000 116198 23802
    1993 140000 147012 -7012
    1994 140000 123291 16709
    1995 140000 85336 54664
    1996 140000 117499 22501
    1997 140000 90607 49393
    1998 140000 77517 62483
    1999 140000 56678 83322
    2000 140000 106642 33358
    2001 140000 178702 -38702
    2002 140000 173814 -33814
    2003 140000 81727 58273
    2004 140000 155330 -15330
    2005 140000 246877 -106877
    2006 140000 159081 -19081
    2007 140000 162176 -22176
    2008 140000 166511 -26511

    Sum total of the differences from 1986 to 2008: 626,681. Vow!!!

    So when looked between the period of 1986 and 2008,
    there were a total of 626,681 un-used visa numbers that can be re-captured.

    This is based on the BIG assumption that the yearly quota for EB categories is 140,000 from 1986 to 2008.
    Does anybody know how to verify this important assumption online --a link to a gov website perhaps?

    It would be good to verify when the law specifying 140,000 visa numbers per year was passed and
    what were the criteria for visa number usage prior to the existence of the law.





    2010 MAP OF FIJI ISLANDS map of fijian islands. Malolo Island Map - Fiji
  • Malolo Island Map - Fiji



  • alex99
    11-01 12:33 PM
    Bumping..



    more...


    map of fijian islands. Island, Fiji - Map of
  • Island, Fiji - Map of



  • GC_dd
    06-11 11:56 AM
    done





    hair Map of Fiji map of fijian islands. Australia and Oceania map
  • Australia and Oceania map



  • Rajeev
    12-19 10:47 AM
    Hi Varsha

    I will join the conference. My e-mail address is rajeevm100@hotmail.com



    more...


    map of fijian islands. [Back to the main Fiji Map]
  • [Back to the main Fiji Map]



  • YesGC_NoGC
    04-10 06:10 PM
    ISit possible to split pre Jan 2003 to 3 or 4 categories?or is it too late...

    What is your EB3-India PD (I-485 either pending, or not yet filed)





    hot Second Segment map of fijian islands. Fiji (Savusavu) (map)
  • Fiji (Savusavu) (map)



  • sc3
    10-16 04:45 PM
    Read your above sentence, then read your below sentence. If I try to find a relation between these two sentences I do not know what you are talking.




    I think you know pretty well what I am talking about. USCIS has not "reacted" in any malicious way against the immigrant community wrt. to July 07 actions. If you find they have done so they will be severely answerable to various laws in the country. Do you think the lawyers will keep quite when they sense blood in the water? There has been no "reaction" by USCIS, except as a figment of imagination in the minds of this community.



    Again I am not sure what you are saying but MY PD is in early 2004 and RD was in Aug, they moved my application to another centre and my new RD is Oct. then I saw 2006 and 2007 cases getting approved. This is not right, why are they going by RD and not on PD?.


    USCIS has always gone by RD, not PD to a large extent (there have been deviations here and there, but none of them are due to policy issues). It is unfortunate that due to your application movement to another center you got a bad "RD" -- you should probably work with them to get the RD fixed.

    PD based processing is not sustainable as I had highlighted before. If you applied for 485 before someone else, you should be approved first. Now I am saying applied for 485, not Labor/Perm. Now dont come back with a post saying I applied July 2 00:01, but someone with July 3rd 23:55 is getting approved before I am. Afford some granularity of a week or so.


    Exactly dude, there should be some synchronization between DOL and USCIS. Just saying that USCIS is not responsible for DOL’s actions does not solve the problem, they can conveniently blame each other and take till eternity to process applications and you will keep saying the same thing that USCIS is not to be blamed.

    No, you did not say that, all you said was USCIS is not doing anything wrong.


    I did not say USCIS is "doodh ka dula", but DoL and USCIS are two different entities. You cant blame one for the problems of the other. USCIS has its share of blames, but to blame everything on USCIS just shows that you have lost your objectivity. You don't want to be blamed for the actions of your colleague, so why do you blame USCIS for things which are not their doing??


    If you keep blaming USCIS for everything (I am sure some of you want to blame the economic crisis, the Darfur issue etc. on USCIS too, come on!, you know you wanted to ;) ), the community's credibility comes into question.


    End of the day, you (and/or others) are distracting the OP's idea with FUD. If you have constructive ideas to channel OPs enthusiasm you should suggest alternatives. Not make her/him fearful with untenable accusations of retribution from USCIS.



    more...


    house Fiji Islands. location map map of fijian islands. Lomaiviti, Fiji Islands
  • Lomaiviti, Fiji Islands



  • drirshad
    07-04 09:35 PM
    immigration-law.com

    07/04/2007: Status and Issues Involving July 2007 485 Fiasco

    * The AILF work on the lawsuit appears to be in progress without any hurdles. It has reported that enough candidates have come forward to participate in the lawsuit as the plaintiffs and it does not need any more candidates to move forward for the lawsuit. Some of other people are likely to be covered as members of the class action regardless of their actual participation in the lawsuit. People should send "THANK YOU" to the AILF Legal Action Center leaders and the attorneys who are actually working on this case. Some contribution to the AILF may be more than appropriate. Please visit the AILF site to learn how they can send in contribution.

    #
    # We have been asked by the readers to report the alleged conspiracy theory. We declined to do it. However, people may want to know potential issues that should be answered and explored. We will discuss these issues on following hypotehtical premises:

    * Presumption of Facts: (1) The I-485 applications have been experiencing a tremendous backlog lately. (2) The causes for the backlog have been known to be delays in the security checks. Some of these applicants have sought a relief in federal courts in the form of mandamus actions. (3) Allegedly, the USCIS pull together local and Service Center employees and pull out pending I-485 cases which were older than six months in backlog, working overtime and during the weekend right before July 1, 2007. This is an assumption at this point. (4) As evidenced by the revised Visa Bulletin, apparently these employees contacted "en mass" the DOS to request the visa numbers for these pending I-485 cases, which the DOS reported in the release of the revised VB turned out exceeding 60,000. (5) The rule requires that the USCIS approves I-485 cases "prior to" to contacting and requesting a visa number. (6) The current USCIS policy and procedure also require that I-485 applications be adjudicated and approved "only after" the completion of clearance of the security checks.

    * Issue I: Hypothetically, what happens if the USCIS takes out the visa number before they obtain the security clearace?
    o Answer I: Obviously it would violate the rules and the laws.
    o Answer II: It will constitue a serious security lapse, compromising the homeland security.
    * Issue II: Hypothetically, what hppens if the USCIS requests and takes out the visa numbers prior to adjudication and approval of the pending I-485 applications?
    o Answer I: It is evident that the USCIS would violate the rules and the laws.
    o Answer II: There could be two probable consequences affecting the backlog I-485 applicants and the new July Visa Bulletin eligible I-485 applicants, shoud the hypothetical facts develop. (1) The backlog I-485 applicants who have been issued I-485 approval notices should not be affected by the fiasco, albeit the potential revocation of the I-485 approvals. In most cases, revocation of the approved I-485 requires the time-consuming immigration court proceedings, assuming that the USCIS has a sufficient cause of action which may be questionable in this case. (2) The backlog I-485 applicants who have yet to receive the approval notice and the USCIS has yet to adjudicate and approve the application might be vulnerable in that the USCIS might be required to return the visa numbers for these cases as there was an error. Hypothetically, these numbers could be returned to the State Department and based on these returned number, the State Department might be required to revise the July Visa Bulletin again.





    tattoo Fiji Map.gif (7126 bytes) map of fijian islands. Taveuni Island Map
  • Taveuni Island Map



  • drona
    07-09 03:14 PM
    Way to go Gabriela!



    more...


    pictures Fiji Islands - Guide Map map of fijian islands. The island nation of Fiji with
  • The island nation of Fiji with



  • coloniel60
    08-15 04:13 PM
    In fact better than expected for EB2

    Nothing new. Whoever is eligible to apply in Sep has already applied except for a few unlucky people stuck in BEC.





    dresses Fiji (Savusavu) (map) map of fijian islands. Fiji Islands is located in the
  • Fiji Islands is located in the



  • newuser
    06-10 04:04 PM
    Done



    more...


    makeup Island, Fiji - Map of map of fijian islands. Fiji Islands. location map
  • Fiji Islands. location map



  • gc_on_demand
    02-11 03:49 PM
    I agree. I tried to see if there is a way FB category in 2009 might have received a spillover from EB. But thats almost impossible given EB is severely backlogged.

    Another way to verify unused 13K in 2009 EB would be to check 2010 FB limit. If there were unused visas from EB in 2009 then they go back to FB in 2010.

    Finally, per Ron unused is not same as wasted. Unused is unassigned. Wasted is .... assigned but action is not taken to close the case. If that is the case then wasted visas won't be available .... neither inside or outside category. It is frightening to think that with so many preadjudicated cases USCIS might be wasting visas! I don't believe this .... but if true ... it is outrageous.

    I have asked to Vin13 if he/she can get source of information from Ron. If you have good contact with him can you ask for source of info ? Any link to USED vs waste number. Or even any link that made definition of USED visas and waste visas and their number for last year ? I am serious to get this fix this time , if I get a link to some document that clarify. I think that will help so many. Please get some links to information and we should build a team to fight for this.





    girlfriend Taveuni Island Map map of fijian islands. Map of the Fiji Islands
  • Map of the Fiji Islands



  • varshadas
    02-09 06:35 PM
    Hello All,
    Can you all please let me know where you all are wrt to contacting the Congressmen Rajeev and Shekhar, I haven't heard from you guys in a while.
    Where are you?

    Thanks,
    Varsha





    hairstyles [Back to the main Fiji Map] map of fijian islands. Fiji Islands Map
  • Fiji Islands Map



  • jayz
    08-15 05:28 PM
    Well, I mean no offense to anybody but why is EB3 ROW so far back while EB2 India and China are as per June bulletin or better?
    I thought for India the approved cases were 5 times the country quota for 2007? Good for those guys that were approved but I still don't get it why ROW is 2002!

    The reasoning that I can see is, you are comparing EB2 to EB3. EB2 gets higher preference than EB3, but I am not sure how the per-country rationing plays in this mix.





    sanjaymm
    10-29 01:43 PM
    I have mailed a notorized letter. I have also forwarded the link to other friends who may have missed this action item.
    Sanjay





    chanduv23
    07-29 02:03 PM
    In that case, employers should mention the following in the offer letter

    " In case, in future, if economy goes bad and recession occurs,we cannot sponsor your green card since it is easy to find american citizens who has minimum qualification."

    This should be mentioned on the offer letters given by big comapnies.Then it is up to H1B candidate whenter to take the offer(risk) or not.
    Can these companies do this????

    Let me tell you my story

    I worked for a mid sized consulting company (not to be mistaken for desi contracting) and GC was filed in March 2004 (it was EB3 labor). I was in my 6th year of h1b in 2005 when this company got bought over and unfortunately I lost job in the 6th year of h1b with only 11 months of h1b left. At that time I was newly married and with no bank balance. Then I looked for a new job, managed to get a nice long term contract job in a month and got h1 transferred to a decent consulting company who applied for my 6th and 7th year of h1b using the labor already filed in the company I was layed off. When in my 6th year my new PERM got approved with this employer and 140 also approved and based on that I got 8th, 9th, 10th year h1b extensions. I managed to file for 485 in July fiasco and then after an year, I left the employer and started using EAD. That employer revoked my i 140 because I left them and then I had to deal with all the AC21 stuff and my journey still continues. Things were not easy, I had to maintain excellent billing rate, in one ocassion the client filed for chapter 11 and did not make payments to my employer and this strained my employer's finances and I had to make it up with a better billing rate with next client to keep my GC process intact and being consinuously employed on high billing contract jobs is also challenging.

    The diference between your situation and mine is - you are left with a choice and a decision to make, whereas me, I felt like was taken to a top of cliff and thrown from there.